Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2460832
 


 



Justice Scalia's Fourth Amendment Text, Context, Clarity, and Occasional Faint-Hearted Originalism


Timothy C. MacDonnell


Washington and Lee University - School of Law

June 30, 2014

Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming
Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-16

Abstract:     
Since joining the United States Supreme Court in 1986, Justice Scalia has been one of the most prominent voices on the Fourth Amendment, having written twenty majority opinions, twelve concurrences and eight dissents on the topic. Justice Scalia’s Fourth Amendment opinions have had a significant effect on the Court’s jurisprudence relative to the Fourth Amendment. Under his pen, the Court has altered its test for determining when the Fourth Amendment should apply; provided a vision for how technology’s encroachment on privacy should be addressed; and articulated the standard for determining whether government officials are entitled to qualified immunity in civil suits involving alleged Fourth Amendment violations. In most of Justice Scalia’s opinions, he has championed the originalist/textualist theory of constitutional interpretation. Based on that theory, he has advocated that the text and context of the Fourth Amendment should govern how the Court interprets most questions of search and seizure law. His Fourth Amendment opinions have also included an emphasis on clear, bright-line rules that can be applied broadly to Fourth Amendment questions. However, there are Fourth Amendment opinions in which Justice Scalia has strayed from these commitments; particularly in the areas of the special needs doctrine and qualified immunity. The article asserts that Justice Scalia’s non-originalist approach in these spheres threatens the cohesiveness of his Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and could, if not corrected, unbalance the Fourth Amendment in favor of law enforcement interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Scalia, Fourth Amendment, originalism.

JEL Classification: K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2014  

Suggested Citation

MacDonnell, Timothy C., Justice Scalia's Fourth Amendment Text, Context, Clarity, and Occasional Faint-Hearted Originalism (June 30, 2014). Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming; Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2460832

Contact Information

Timothy C. MacDonnell (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 93
Downloads: 16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds