Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2463377
 


 



Contesting the Self: Negotiating Subjectivities in Nineteenth-Century Ontario Defamation Trials


Rosemary Coombe


York University

1991

11 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 3-40 (1991)

Abstract:     
Understanding the hegemonic quality of legal discourse requires us to view hegemony as unfolding in multiple sights of discursive practice. Thus, we must begin to analyze not only hegemonic legal discourse but hegemony in social sights of legal practice in order to see that legal practice is essential in processes of domination and social ordering. In this article, I explore the processes of political subjection and resistance as they manifest in witness testimony and judicial decisions from late nineteenth century defamation trials in Ontario. I argue that slander and libel suits were integral in constructing particular legitimate knowledges about class and gender as categories of social identity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Legal discourse, Legal history, Defamation trials

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 9, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Coombe, Rosemary, Contesting the Self: Negotiating Subjectivities in Nineteenth-Century Ontario Defamation Trials (1991). 11 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 3-40 (1991). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2463377

Contact Information

Rosemary Coombe (Contact Author)
York University ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://www.yorku.ca/rcoombe/publications.htm
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 47
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds