Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2465039
 


 



Removal: Necessary and Sufficient for Presidential Control


Neomi Rao


George Mason University School of Law

July 11, 2014

Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1205-1276, 2014
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 14-27

Abstract:     
Legal and political uncertainty continues to surround the independent agencies. Courts and scholars have recognized that control over administration usually depends on political realities rather than on legal categories of "independence." This perspective, however, tends to disregard the constitutional boundaries for administration. Contrary to the conventional view, I explain why Congress's authority over agency structure must have judicially enforceable limits in order to prevent encroachment on the executive power. In light of the constitutional text and structure, this Article demonstrates that the ability to remove principal officers is necessary and sufficient for presidential control of the executive branch. This means that all agencies, including the so-called independent agencies, must answer to the President. The principle allows Congress and the President to operate within their respective spheres while leaving most questions about actual administrative control to the political process. Limits on the President's removal authority have always been in tension with the basic constitutional design and in recent years there has been growing dissatisfaction with the meaning, structure, and effects of independence. The precedents and functional justifications for supporting agency independence have largely collapsed. The issue is ripe for reconsideration. The constitutional structure requires presidential control and supervision over administration and the removal power provides the mechanism for the possibility of such control.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Keywords: accountability, administrative agency, Appointments Clause, Article II, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CFPB, conventions, directive authority, enforceability, Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, inferior officers, removal at will, separation of powers, severance, supervision

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Rao, Neomi, Removal: Necessary and Sufficient for Presidential Control (July 11, 2014). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1205-1276, 2014; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 14-27. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2465039

Contact Information

Neomi Rao (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 182
Downloads: 39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds