The Extension of Statutes of Limitations for the Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art

Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Vol. 31, May 2014

4 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2014 Last revised: 22 Nov 2014

Date Written: May 16, 2014

Abstract

The justifications for application of statute of limitations has come under scrutiny with recent cases involving Nazi-looted art. The 2012 discovery (and 2013 announcement) of a major art haul has major ramifications for the art community, German museums and the original owners of the looted art and heirs of Nazi victims and survivors. For over half a century, Cornelius Gurlitt concealed a treasure trove of art, approximately 1400 works work believed to be worth more than $US 1.35 billion. Caught up in this saga are individuals seeking to reclaimed looted art. These people face challenges, including strict deadlines established by statutes of limitations.

Keywords: Gurlitt, statute of limitations, art theft, Nazi, Holocaust, degenerate art, Washington Principles, demand and refusal, discovery rule, Monuments Men, looting, cultural heritage, World War II, Hitler, Goebbels

Suggested Citation

Amineddoleh, Leila, The Extension of Statutes of Limitations for the Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art (May 16, 2014). Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Vol. 31, May 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2467235

Leila Amineddoleh (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Abstract Views
906
Rank
353,821
PlumX Metrics