Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2475853
 


 



The Return of the King: The Unsavory Origins of Administrative Law


Gary Lawson


Boston University School of Law

August 4, 2014

Texas Law Review, Forthcoming
Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-46

Abstract:     
Philip Hamburger’s Is Administrative Law Unlawful? is a truly brilliant and important book. In a prodigious feat of scholarship, Professor Hamburger uncovers the British and civil law antecedents of modern American administrative law, showing that contemporary administrative law “is really just the most recent manifestation of a recurring problem.” That problem is the problem of power: its temptations, its dangers, and its tendency to corrupt. Administrative law, far from being a distinctive product of modernity, is thus the “contemporary expression of the old tendency toward absolute power – toward consolidated power outside and above the law.” It represents precisely the forms of governmental action that constitutionalism – both in general and as specifically manifested in the United States Constitution – was designed to prevent. Accordingly, virtually every aspect of modern administrative law directly challenges the Constitution.

This extraordinary book will be immensely valuable to anyone interested in public law. My comments here concern two relatively minor points that call for more clarification. First, Professor Hamburger does not clearly identify what it means for administrative law to be “unlawful.” Does that mean “in violation of the written Constitution”? “In violation of unwritten constitutional norms?” In violation of natural law”? There is evidence that Professor Hamburger means something more than the former, but it is not clear what more is intended. In order to gauge the real status of administrative law, we must have a more direct conception of law than Professor Hamburger provides.

Second, much of Professor Hamburger’s historical and constitutional analysis focuses on the subdelegation of legislative authority. While his discussion contains numerous profound insights, including some that require correction in my own prior scholarship on the subject, it does not discuss how to distinguish interpretation by judicial and executive actors from lawmaking by those actors. Presumably, the prohibition on subdelegation of legislative authority prohibits only the latter. Figuring out where interpretation ends and lawmaking begins is one of the most difficult questions in all of jurisprudence, and I am not convinced that Professor Hamburger can successfully perform an end-run around it.

But these are modest nitpicks about a path-breaking work that should keep people of all different persuasions engaged and occupied for quite some time.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: administrative law, rule of law, delegation

JEL Classification: K19, K23, K29, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 5, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Lawson, Gary, The Return of the King: The Unsavory Origins of Administrative Law (August 4, 2014). Texas Law Review, Forthcoming; Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-46. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2475853

Contact Information

Gary Lawson (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-3812 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,212
Downloads: 352
Download Rank: 47,908

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.610 seconds