|
||||
|
||||
Rethinking ComplianceAnne RileyIndependent D. Daniel SokolUniversity of Florida - Levin College of Law; George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center August 25, 2014 3 J. of Antitrust Enforcement 31 (2015) University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 16-3 Abstract: This article addresses optimal deterrence and its limits in the context of creating a more effective mechanism for antitrust compliance to take hold in businesses. We suggest proactive encouragement of compliance programs. Antitrust authorities should work with the business community to create a regulatory scheme that rewards good behavior while punishing bad behavior. To do so, antitrust authorities need to understand how to create and sustain compliance efforts within a company. The proper role of an antitrust compliance program should be to ensure compliance with the law and to promote ethical behaviour by and between companies as part of good corporate governance. Antitrust authorities should play a role in encouraging and supporting this, in the same way other enforcement authorities do (for example in relation to FCPA/anti-bribery enforcement). We argue that from a policy perspective, antitrust enforcement should not just be about punishment but about changing normative values within organizations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47 Keywords: compliance, cartels, leniency, antitrust, competition, collusion JEL Classification: K21, L41, M14 Date posted: August 5, 2014 ; Last revised: January 18, 2016Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.453 seconds