Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2478245
 


 



Judging Third-Party Funding


Victoria Shannon Sahani


Washington and Lee University - School of Law

June 15, 2015

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 63, 2016

Abstract:     
Third-party funding is an arrangement whereby an outside entity finances the legal representation of a party involved in litigation or arbitration. The outside entity – called a “third-party funder” – could be a bank, hedge fund, insurance company, or some other entity or individual that finances the party’s legal representation in return for a profit. Third-party funding is a controversial, dynamic, and evolving phenomenon. The practice has attracted national headlines and the attention of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Advisory Committee stated in a recent report that “judges currently have the power to obtain information about third-party funding when it is relevant in a particular case,” but the Committee did not provide any additional guidance regarding how to determine the relevance of third-party funding, what information to obtain, or from whom to obtain that information. This Article provides that needed guidance by setting forth revisions and reinterpretations of procedural rules to provide judges and arbitrators with disclosure requirements and a framework for handling known issues as they arise. By revising and interpreting the procedural rules as suggested in this Article, judges and arbitrators will be able to gain a better sense of the prevalence, structures, and impact of third-party funding and its effects (if any) on dispute resolution procedures. Over time, these observations will reveal the true systemic impact of third-party funding and contribute to developing more robust third-party funding procedural regulations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: third-party litigation funding, litigation funding, third-party funding, litigation, procedure, federal rules of civil procedure, arbitration, international arbitration, privileges

JEL Classification: K40, K41, K42, K49, K00, K10, K19, K13, K20, K29


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 10, 2014 ; Last revised: July 14, 2015

Suggested Citation

Sahani, Victoria Shannon, Judging Third-Party Funding (June 15, 2015). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 63, 2016. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2478245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478245

Contact Information

Victoria Shannon Sahani (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
HOME PAGE: http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/profiledetail.asp?id=686
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 388
Downloads: 41

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds