Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=247884
 
 

Citations (9)



 
 

Footnotes (282)



 


 



Cost-Benefit Default Principles


Cass R. Sunstein


Harvard Law School

October 2000

AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 00-07; University of Chicago, Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 104

Abstract:     
In an important but thus far unnoticed development, federal courts have created a new series of "default principles" for statutory interpretation, authorizing regulatory agencies, when statutes are unclear, (a) to exempt trivial risks from regulation and thus to develop a kind of common law of "acceptable risks," (b) to take account of substitute risks created by regulation, and thus to engage in "health-health" tradeoffs, (c) to consider whether compliance with regulation is feasible, (d) to take costs into account, and (e) to engage in cost-benefit balancing, and thus to develop a kind of common law of cost-benefit analysis. These cost-benefit default principles are both legitimate and salutary, because they give rationality and sense the benefit of the doubt. At the same time, they leave many open questions. They do not say whether agencies are required, and not merely permitted, to go in the direction they indicate; they do not indicate when agencies might reasonably reject the principles; and they do not say what, specifically, will be counted as an "acceptable" risk or a sensible form of cost-benefit analysis. Addressing the open questions, this essay urges that the principles should ordinarily be taken as mandatory, not merely permissive; that agencies may reject them in certain identifiable circumstances; and that steps should be taken toward quantitative analysis of the effects of regulation, designed to discipline the relevant inquiries. An understanding of these points should promote understanding of emerging "second generation" debates, involving not whether to adopt a presumption in favor of cost-benefit balancing, but when the presumption is rebutted, and what, in particular, cost-benefit analysis should be taken to entail.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 81

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Sunstein, Cass R., Cost-Benefit Default Principles (October 2000). AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 00-07; University of Chicago, Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 104. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=247884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.247884

Contact Information

Cass R. Sunstein (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts Ave
Areeda Hall 225
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-2291 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,600
Downloads: 875
Download Rank: 13,813
Citations:  9
Footnotes:  282

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds