Noel Canning and Remedial Obligation Under the Constitution
100 Virginia Law Review Online 47 (2014)
22 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2014 Last revised: 21 Oct 2014
Date Written: August 14, 2014
Abstract
There is a pervasive assumption that the Supreme Court's ruling in NLRB v. Noel Canning has rendered void the decisions of the Board during the period when it lacked a quorum because a majority of its members held their posts through unconstitutional recess appointments. The assumption is unfounded. The question of remedy for the wrong identified in Noel Canning should not be decided in the air; it should be decided contextually, as one involving whether and how to provide relief to parties affected by a wholly concluded constitutional violation, in a manner that is akin to harmless- and plain-error review.
Keywords: Noel Canning, constitutional remedies, structural error, harmless error, plain error
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation