The Forgotten Role of Consent in Defamation and Employment Reference Cases
Alex B. Long
University of Tennessee College of Law
August 17, 2014
Florida Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 719, 2014
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 253
As has been well documented, the fear of defamation suits and related claims leads many employers to refuse to provide meaningful employment references. However, an employer who provides a negative reference concerning an employee enjoys a privilege in an ensuing defamation action if the employee has consented to the release of information concerning the employee’s job performance. Thus, many attorneys now advise prospective employers to have applicants sign consent agreements, permitting the prospective employer to conduct an investigation into the applicant’s work history and releasing from liability anyone who provides information about the employee’s work history. The Restatement (Second) of Torts has been highly influential in shaping the development of the defense of consent in the defamation context. This article looks at the consent defense within the context of employment reference cases. Specifically, the article examines the consent defense as described in the Restatement from an historical perspective and argues that the authors fundamentally misstated the law in a manner that has had negative consequence for employees who have been the victims of defamatory references.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60
Keywords: Defamation, References, Employment, Torts, Consent, Waiver
JEL Classification: J00, J60, K12, K13
Date posted: August 18, 2014 ; Last revised: November 3, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds