The Application of the Disqualification Clause to Congress: A Response to Benjamin Cassady, 'You've Got Your Crook, I've Got Mine': Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn't (Always) Disqualify

25 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2014 Last revised: 13 Apr 2016

See all articles by Brian C. Kalt

Brian C. Kalt

Michigan State University College of Law

Date Written: September 2, 2014

Abstract

This article is a response to Benjamin Cassady’s recent article, “You’ve Got Your Crook, I’ve Got Mine”: Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn’t (Always) Disqualify. It agrees with Your Crook that disqualification does not apply to election to the House or Senate, and that voters should have as free a hand as the Constitution will allow to elect representatives and senators that others in Congress might find scurrilous. The article focuses, however, on disagreements and distinctions. Part I critiques the nature of the structural claims in Your Crook. Part II examines the importance of the legal-process question: who decides whether a particular person is disqualified from a particular post? Part III looks at other elements of the constitutional structure that Your Crook does not consider. Part IV similarly fleshes out the question of disqualification and the presidency. Finally, Part V takes issue with Mr. Cassady’s application of the term “pardon” to the election of a previously disqualified or expelled person.

Keywords: impeachment, disqualification, congressional qualifications, presidential qualifications

Suggested Citation

Kalt, Brian C., The Application of the Disqualification Clause to Congress: A Response to Benjamin Cassady, 'You've Got Your Crook, I've Got Mine': Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn't (Always) Disqualify (September 2, 2014). Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2490963

Brian C. Kalt (Contact Author)

Michigan State University College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
517-432-6987 (Phone)
517-432-6879 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
95
Abstract Views
1,951
Rank
493,626
PlumX Metrics