|
||||
|
||||
Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach
Michael R. Baye Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Business Economics & Public Policy Dan Kovenock University of Iowa; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Casper G. De Vries Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE); Tinbergen Institute; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) November 2000 CESifo Working Paper No. 373 Abstract: A simple auction-theoretic framework is used to examine symmetric litigation environments where the legal ownership of a disputed asset is unknown by the court. The court observes only the quality of the case presented by each party, and awards the asset to the party presenting the best case. Rational litigants influence the quality of their cases by hiring skillful attorneys. This framework permits us to compare the equilibrium legal expenditures that arise under a continuum of legal systems. The British rule, American rule, and some recently proposed legal reforms are special cases of our model.
Keywords: Auctions, contests, litigation, fee-shifting JEL Classifications: D8, K4 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: January 28, 2001 ; Last revised: July 22, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.141 seconds.