Made for Each Other: The Interdependence of Deconstruction and Philosophical Hermeneutics

26 Philosophy & Social Criticism 51, 2000

Posted: 25 Feb 2015

Date Written: February 24, 2000

Abstract

Critics of Hans-Georg Gadamer maintain that his philosophical hermeneutics is unduly conservative: supposedly, Gadamer too readily accepts tradition and too quickly assumes that a text has a unified and understandable meaning. Critics of Jacques Derrida, meanwhile, declare that deconstruction leads to nihilism: if the meaning of every text is undecidable, then a text can mean anything at all - no one meaning is better or worse than any other. And if there is no ground to stand upon, these critics add, then how can we normatively evaluate others (or ourselves)? In this essay, I respond to the critics of both Gadamer and Derrida by arguing that philosophical hermeneutics and deconstruction should be understood as complementary postmodern philosophies, as mutually supportive descriptions of the hermeneutic situation. As such, deconstruction counters the charge that philosophical hermeneutics is conservative: instead, a Derridean view uncovers the radical political potential that resides within Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Meanwhile, philosophical hermeneutics counters the charge that deconstruction is nihilistic and cannot support ethical or political critique. A Gadamerian view explains how deconstruction assumes the possibility of understanding meaning and maintaining values that can engender critique.

Keywords: deconstruction, Derrida, Gadamer, hermeneutics, justice, philosophical hermeneutics, modernism

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Stephen Matthew, Made for Each Other: The Interdependence of Deconstruction and Philosophical Hermeneutics (February 24, 2000). 26 Philosophy & Social Criticism 51, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2569340

Stephen Matthew Feldman (Contact Author)

University of Wyoming - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 3035
Laramie, WY 82071
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
328
PlumX Metrics