|
||||
|
||||
The Bias of the RSR Estimator and the Accuracy of Some Alternatives
William N. Goetzmann Yale School of Management - International Center for Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Liang Peng University of Colorado at Boulder January 2001 Yale SOM Working Paper No. ICF - 00-27 Abstract: This paper analyzes the implications of cross-sectional hetero- skedasticity in repeat sales regression (RSR). RSR estimators are essentially geometric averages of individual asset returns because of the logarithmic transformation of price relatives. We show that the cross sectional variance of asset returns affects the magnitude of bias in the average return estimate for that period, while reducing the bias for the surrounding periods. It is not easy to use an approximation method to correct the bias problem. We suggest a maximum-likelihood alternative to the RSR that directly estimates index returns that are analogous to the RSR estimators but are arithmetic averages of individual returns. Simulations show that these estimators are robust to time-varying cross-sectional variance and may be more accurate than RSR and some alternative methods of RSR.
Keywords: Repeat sales estimators, Real estate index, Simulation JEL Classifications: C43, R31, R10 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: February 08, 2001 ; Last revised: March 05, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.