Mixture and Distribution of Different Water Qualities: An Experiment on Alternative Scenarios Concerning Vertical Structure in a Complex Market
Laboratori d'Economia Experimental (LEE); LINEEX and University Jaume I of Castellon
Universitat Jaume I
University of East Anglia (UEA) - Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS); University of Valencia - LINEEX
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid - Department of Economics
University of York - Derwent College
LINEEX Working Paper No. 12/00
We set up a model of water management, which is inspired by the possibility of mixing water of different qualities. Water is supplied to two types of consumers with different preferences for water quality and quantity. A distributional knot may exist which optimally distributes the supplied water in the downstream market. Different scenarios compare experimentally the advantages of a centralized versus a decentralized resource management. We conducted experiments with 14 markets in three different settings, labelled as "upstream monopoly", "upstream duopoly" and "duopoly-monopsony". We find that a two-product monopoly performs better than the duopoly regarding social welfare and volatility with respect to prices and production. Especially, the centralization of information enhances learning in the market considered. An interesting observation is that monopolistic subjects post much lower price offers at the outset of the experiment than duopolists do. However, in the course of the experiment production is lower and prices are higher in the monopolistic structure. In the duopoly-monopsony case, monopsonistic subjects failed to exercise market power and market prices did not reflect correctly the differences in qualities. Nevertheless, increased upstream competition and downstream market power helped to mitigate the waste of resources in the economy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56
Keywords: Water Management, Experimental Economics, Vertical Structure
JEL Classification: C9,D4,L1,Q2
Date posted: February 6, 2001
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds