Municipal Bankruptcy, Essential Municipal Services, and Taxpayers' Voice

38 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2015 Last revised: 25 Sep 2015

Date Written: April 6, 2015

Abstract

When a municipality is the debtor, as is the case in chapter 9 municipal bankruptcies, one might assume that the law recognizes community/taxpayer interests at all stages of chapter 9 proceedings. That assumption would be incorrect. Unlike bondholders, public employees (active and retired), and other creditors affected by municipal insolvency, all of whom have a voice in chapter 9 proceedings, a municipal debtor’s residents — taxpayers who pay for and rely upon municipal services — do not have a clear statutory right to participate in a chapter 9 case. In this article, I argue that taxpayers should have a voice at every stage of a chapter 9 proceeding, as taxpayers are directly and profoundly impacted by municipal insolvency and by chapter 9 plans of adjustment. Citing Stockton and Detroit municipal bankruptcy cases, I argue that taxpayers ought to be considered a type of creditor, owed a debt of at least minimally acceptable essential services, and that taxpayers therefore should have a voice alongside other creditors whenever an insolvent municipality seeks chapter 9 relief.

Keywords: municipality, debtor, bankruptcy, taxpayer

Suggested Citation

Chung, Christine Sgarlata, Municipal Bankruptcy, Essential Municipal Services, and Taxpayers' Voice (April 6, 2015). Widener Law Journal, Vol. 24, 2015, Albany Law School Research Paper No. 8 for 2015-2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2590843

Christine Sgarlata Chung (Contact Author)

Albany Law School ( email )

80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
942
Rank
521,884
PlumX Metrics