Smart Money, Noise Trading and Stock Price Behavior

79 Pages Posted: 4 Jul 2004 Last revised: 13 Mar 2023

See all articles by John Y. Campbell

John Y. Campbell

Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Albert S. Kyle

University of Maryland

Date Written: October 1988

Abstract

This paper derives and estimates an equilibrium model of stock price behavior in which exogenous "noise traders" interact with risk-averse "smart money" investors. The model assumes that changes in exponentially detrended dividends and prices are normally distributed, and that smart money investors have constant absolute risk aversion. In equilibrium, the stock price is the present value of expected dividends, discounted at the riskless interest rate, less a constant risk premium, plus a term which is due to noise trading. The model expresses both stock prices and dividends as sums of unobserved components in continuous time. The model is able to explain the volatility and predictability of U.S. stock returns in the period 1871-1986 in either of two ways. Either the discount rate is 4% or below, and the constant risk premium is large; or the discount rate is 5% or above, and noise trading, correlated with fundamentals, increases the volatility of stock prices. The data are not well able to distinguish between these explanations.

Suggested Citation

Campbell, John Y. and Kyle, Albert (Pete) S., Smart Money, Noise Trading and Stock Price Behavior (October 1988). NBER Working Paper No. t0071, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=260291

John Y. Campbell (Contact Author)

Harvard University - Department of Economics ( email )

Littauer Center
Room 213
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-6448 (Phone)
617-495-7730 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://scholar.harvard.edu/campbell

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Albert (Pete) S. Kyle

University of Maryland ( email )

College Park
College Park, MD 20742
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
254
Abstract Views
3,263
Rank
220,798
PlumX Metrics