Value for Funding: Expanding the Analytical Framework for Infrastructure P3 Evaluation

Journal of Structured Finance, Vol. 21, No. 2, Summer 2015

Posted: 22 May 2015 Last revised: 30 Jul 2015

See all articles by M. Julie Kim

M. Julie Kim

Stanford Global Projects Center; BeneTellus

John Ryan

Greengate LLC

Date Written: May 22, 2015

Abstract

Value for Money (VfM) is the standard evaluation framework for infrastructure public-private partnership (P3) alternatives to traditional public-sector project procurement and financing. VfM’s primary focus is on a net present value cost comparison between the alternatives. However, in light of the challenges that US state and local governments face in the current economic environment, an additional analytical framework that explicitly expands the focus to include public-sector funding and fiscal issues in the evaluation of an infrastructure P3 would be useful in many cases. We are calling this new framework a ‘Value for Funding’ (VfF) approach. This paper briefly describes the rationale and methodology of a VfF approach in general, and lists four planned papers by the authors to further develop the framework over the next year.

Keywords: infrastructure, public-private partnerships, infrastructure funding, public-sector fiscal issues, stochastic modelling, Value for Money, Value for Funding

JEL Classification: C15, H43, H54, H71, H72

Suggested Citation

Kim, M. Julie and Ryan, John, Value for Funding: Expanding the Analytical Framework for Infrastructure P3 Evaluation (May 22, 2015). Journal of Structured Finance, Vol. 21, No. 2, Summer 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2609088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609088

M. Julie Kim

Stanford Global Projects Center ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

BeneTellus ( email )

P O Box 9310
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
United States
213-949-0525 (Phone)

John Ryan (Contact Author)

Greengate LLC ( email )

1752 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
1.917.270.3784 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.greengatellc.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
561
PlumX Metrics