Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=261670
 
 

Citations



 


 



Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: Irb Oversight as the Next Best Solution to the Abolitionist Approach


Jesse Goldner


Saint Louis University School of Law


Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2001

Abstract:     
The author details the conflicts of interest facing individual investigators and research institutions and describes the current mechanisms, primarily focused at the relationship between the investigator and the research institution, to regulate these conflicts. The author finds these mechanisms insufficient and believes that the best approach is not to regulate conflicts, but to abolish them. The author acknowledges, however, that there is a lack of political will in an abolitionist approach. He proposes, therefore, institutional review board oversight at the level of the relationship between researcher and individual subjects as the next best solution.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 1, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Goldner, Jesse, Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: Irb Oversight as the Next Best Solution to the Abolitionist Approach. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=261670

Contact Information

Jesse Goldner (Contact Author)
Saint Louis University School of Law ( email )
100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63108
United States
314-977-2776 (Phone)
314-977-3332 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 742

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.266 seconds