Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=262392
 


 



'Their Promises of Paradise': Institutional Segregation, Community Treatment, the ADA, and Olmstead v. L.C.


Michael L. Perlin


New York Law School


Houston Law Review, Vol. 37, P. 999, 2000

Abstract:     
This article argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 119 S. Ct. 2176 (1999), finding a qualified right to community treatment and services for certain institutionalized persons under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and endorsing an "integration mandate," forces us to reconsider the role of the "least restrictive alternative" in institutional mental disability law, and may serve to resuscitate and revitalize the constitutional foundations of that principle in this area of the law. In this context, Olmstead has the capacity to be the Supreme Court's most therapeutic mental disability law decision since that Court decided, in Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972), that the "nature and duration" of civil commitment were constitutionally bound.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 6, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Perlin, Michael L., 'Their Promises of Paradise': Institutional Segregation, Community Treatment, the ADA, and Olmstead v. L.C.. Houston Law Review, Vol. 37, P. 999, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=262392

Contact Information

Michael L. Perlin (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
212-431-2183 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nyls.edu/bios/perlin.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,118

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds