Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=262579
 
 

Citations (7)



 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



Money, Politics and Judicial Decisions: A Case Study of Arbitration Law in Alabama


Stephen J. Ware


University of Kansas - School of Law


Journal of Law & Politics, Vol. 15, No. 645, 1999

Abstract:     
This article presents the results of a study of 106 decisions by the Supreme Court of Alabama from January 18, 1995 through July 9, 1999. The decisions are in the area of arbitration law and reveal the remarkably close correlation between a justice's votes on arbitration cases and his or her primary source or campaign funds. Justices whose election campaigns are funded by plaintiffs' lawyers oppose arbitration, whereas justices whose campaigns are funded by business favor arbitration. The correlation holds not just with regard to ideologically-charged doctrines, like unconscionability, but also with seemingly bland questions of contract formation, interpretation and waiver.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Ware, Stephen J., Money, Politics and Judicial Decisions: A Case Study of Arbitration Law in Alabama. Journal of Law & Politics, Vol. 15, No. 645, 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=262579

Contact Information

Stephen J. Ware (Contact Author)
University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
785-864-9209 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ku.edu/ware
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 850
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 193,973
Citations:  7
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds