Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=263353
 
 

Footnotes (115)



 


 



The Right of Expressive Association and Private Universities' Racial Preferences and Speech Codes


David Bernstein


George Mason University School of Law

2001

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-10

Abstract:     
In Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the Supreme Court ruled that the Scouts has a First Amendment expressive association right to exclude gay adult volunteers. The reaction to Dale has divided along ideological lines. Conservatives generally support Dale because in their eyes it prevents government from taking sides in the culture wars. "Progressives," including many liberals who otherwise have strong civil libertarian instincts, oppose Dale because it seems to deal a blow to gay rights. Progressives also fear that organizations that wish to discriminate against other groups will rely on Dale for constitutional exemptions from anti-discrimination laws. As a legal matter, however, Dale was not about the Kulturkampf between gay rights activists and their conservative opponents, nor was it about a general "right to discriminate." Rather, the underlying issue in Dale was whether a private, non-profit expressive association has a First Amendment right to discriminate to prevent dilution of its message. Despite general liberal opposition to Dale, the opinion may protect some of the left's favorite causes. Part I briefly discusses the history of the expressive association right and its relationship to anti-discrimination law. Part II argues that Dale provides a constitutional defense to anti-discrimination laws by nonprofit organizations when the organizations' ideology requires discrimination. As discussed in Part II, both white and black racist and racialist groups have a right to exclude members of other races. Part III explains that the most significant nonprofit organizations with an ideological commitment to discrimination are not overtly racist organizations, but elite private universities that engage in racial preferences in favor of minority applicants. Private universities faced with reverse discrimination lawsuits may find constitutional respite in the right to expressive association if they are willing to admit that they engage in racial preferences. One way organizations protect their ability to express a particular message is by banning their opponents from speaking in their organizations. California's Leonard Law makes university speech codes illegal, and several state constitutions arguably do the same. Part IV opines that private university speech codes are protected against hostile regulations by the expressive association right recognized in Dale.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 16, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, David, The Right of Expressive Association and Private Universities' Racial Preferences and Speech Codes (2001). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=263353 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263353

Contact Information

David Eliot Bernstein (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8089 (Phone)
703-993-8202 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dbernste
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,798
Downloads: 238
Download Rank: 75,724
Footnotes:  115

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds