|
||||
|
||||
Best Foot Forward or Best for Last in a Sequential Auction?Archishman ChakrabortyYork University - Schulich School of Business Nandini GuptaIndiana University - Kelley School of Business Rick HarbaughIndiana University - Business Economics and Public Policy; Indiana University - Department of Economics July 2004 Abstract: Should a seller with private information sell the best or worst goods first? Considering the sequential auction of two stochastically equivalent goods, we find that the seller has an incentive to impress buyers by selling the better good first because the seller's sequencing strategy endogenously generates correlation in the values of the goods across periods. When this impression effect is strong enough, selling the better good first is the unique pure-strategy equilibrium. By credibly revealing to all buyers the seller's ranking of the goods, an equilibrium strategy of sequencing the goods reduces buyer information rents and increases expected revenues in accordance with the linkage principle.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Keywords: Sequential Auctions, Seller information, Seller Sequencing, Declining Price Anomaly, Linkage Principle, Privatization Auctions JEL Classification: D44, D82 working papers seriesDate posted: April 13, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.500 seconds