|
||||
|
||||
Antitrust Divestiture in Network IndustriesHoward A. ShelanskiGeorgetown University Gregory SidakTilburg Law & Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University; Criterion Economics, L.L.C. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 1-99, Winter 2001 Abstract: The landmark Microsoft case raises challenging questions concerning antitrust remedies. In this Article, we propose a framework for assessing the costs and benefits of different remedies, particularly divestiture, in monopolization cases involving network industries. Our approach can assist a court or enforcement agency not only in analyzing the welfare effects of divestiture, but also in choosing more generally among alternative kinds of remedies. The framework would, for example, apply to a court's choice between damages and injunctive remedies or between behavioral injunctions and structural injunctions. After developing our framework, we apply it to the divestiture proposals made by the government and others in the Microsoft case. We argue that those proposals leave open important questions that must be answered before divestiture can be shown to be either the best remedial alternative or to create likely net gains in economic welfare.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 93 JEL Classification: KO, L4, L5, D6, K21, K23, L9 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 19, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds