|
||||
|
||||
Why Law Now Needs to Control Rather than Follow Neo-Classical EconomicsJohn William DraperUniversity of Pennsylvania September 14, 2015 Pace Environmental Law (PELR) Review, Vol. 33, Forthcoming U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 15-27 Abstract: Neo-classical economics and selfish notions of utilitarianism are driving the globalized economy. Those approaches are destined to fail as they have no brake to discourage humanity from consuming, populating, or polluting enough to harm the life support system of our planet. As they take lives for proprietary gain, neo-classical economics and its decision tool, cost-benefit analysis, work to increase humanity’s foreseeable risks. We should reject the theory and its tools. We need to search for ways to control rather than follow neo-classical economics. We need a careful discussion about the needed changes and their timing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 84 Keywords: Law & economics, administrative law, environmental law, cost-benefit analysis, CBA, neo-classical economics, selfishness, significant risk, foreseeability, irreversibility, moral law, morality, precautionary principle JEL Classification: D61, D81, E13, K23, K32, Date posted: September 17, 2015Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds