Precedent and Judicial Power after the Founding

Polly J. Price

Emory University School of Law

January 6, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 42, pp 81-121, December 2000

A recent decision by a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit enlivened the controversy over court rules that prevent citation to unpublished opinions when it held that the Circuit's non-citation rule violates Article III of the United States Constitution. This Article affirms the view that judicial power includes a doctrine of precedent, without relying solely upon an originalist interpretation of Article III. This approach identifies a consistent "core idea" of precedent that courts must consider how a similar case was decided in the past, even where there are varying ideas about the binding nature of that precedent. A long-standing tradition has viewed precedent as a necessary starting point for judicial decision. When a court departs from this core idea, it violates the essential function of the judiciary to treat like cases alike or explain the difference.

Accepted Paper Series

Not Available For Download

Date posted: September 3, 2001 ; Last revised: January 9, 2011

Suggested Citation

Price, Polly J., Precedent and Judicial Power after the Founding (January 6, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 42, pp 81-121, December 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=266411

Contact Information

Polly J. Price (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-7869 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 625

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds