Precedent and Judicial Power after the Founding

Polly J. Price

Emory University School of Law

January 6, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 42, pp 81-121, December 2000

A recent decision by a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit enlivened the controversy over court rules that prevent citation to unpublished opinions when it held that the Circuit's non-citation rule violates Article III of the United States Constitution. This Article affirms the view that judicial power includes a doctrine of precedent, without relying solely upon an originalist interpretation of Article III. This approach identifies a consistent "core idea" of precedent that courts must consider how a similar case was decided in the past, even where there are varying ideas about the binding nature of that precedent. A long-standing tradition has viewed precedent as a necessary starting point for judicial decision. When a court departs from this core idea, it violates the essential function of the judiciary to treat like cases alike or explain the difference.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: September 3, 2001 ; Last revised: January 9, 2011

Suggested Citation

Price, Polly J., Precedent and Judicial Power after the Founding (January 6, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 42, pp 81-121, December 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=266411

Contact Information

Polly J. Price (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-7869 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 648

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds