Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=267382
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (135)



 


 



Takings Reassessed


Abraham Bell


Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law; University of San Diego School of Law

Gideon Parchomovsky


University of Pennsylvania Law School; Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 277-318, April 2001

Abstract:     
In this Essay, we challenge the conventional typology of constitutional takings by bringing to light a previously unrecognized type of taking-the derivative taking. We show that virtually every exercise of the power of takings generates derivative takings that have largely evaded takings scholars. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the failure of existing takings doctrine to account for derivative takings leads to inefficient and inequitable results. In particular, this failure disproportionately harms the poor.

To remedy this problem, we craft an economic model of self-assessment to optimize constitutional protection at low administrative cost. Importantly, our self-assessment mechanism incentivizes property owners to report truthfully the losses they suffer as a result of government takings. We accomplish this by basing our mechanism on the principle of probabilistic enforcement accompanied by weighted penalties on exaggerations. By lowering the administrative cost of compensation, our self-assessment mechanism enables the compensation of currently uncompensated property owners, and enhances economic efficiency as it forces the government to fully internalize the cost of its actions.

We further show that the utilization of our self-assessment mechanism can illuminate and resolve many of the shortcomings of existing takings doctrine. Our self-assessment mechanism may be used to compensate victims of physical takings and perform this function at a much lower cost than the judicial mechanism currently in place. Its utilization in the context of regulatory takings offers the opportunity to reduce dramatically the cost of administering claims and to clarify such currently ambiguous rules as when a regulation "goes too far" and becomes an exercise of the power of eminent domain. Finally, the information garnered from the self-assessment report may enable us to distinguish between uses of the taxation power that legitimately go uncompensated and takings that demand compensation. We submit that the aggregation of these effects would result in a better and fairer use of the takings power, and begin the process of injecting coherence into a desperately confused area of the law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 19, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Bell, Abraham and Parchomovsky, Gideon, Takings Reassessed. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 277-318, April 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=267382

Contact Information

Abraham Bell (Contact Author)
Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law
Ramat Gan, 52900
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://law.biu.ac.il/English/segelE.php#
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Gideon Parchomovsky
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-1603 (Phone)
Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Gan 52900
Israel
972-2-5317078 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,370
Downloads: 184
Download Rank: 97,994
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  135

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds