Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses

Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 97-110, 2017

Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper No. 16-13

16 Pages Posted: 27 Oct 2015 Last revised: 4 Feb 2017

See all articles by Re'em Segev

Re'em Segev

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 27, 2015

Abstract

Criminal prohibitions typically forbid harming people. Justificatory defenses, such as lesser evil, justifying necessity and justifying self-defense, provide exceptions to such prohibitions if certain conditions are met. One common condition is that the agent is not responsible for the conflict. The questions whether justificatory defenses should include such a condition, and if so what should be its content, are controversial. I argue that responsibility for a conflict counts against protecting the responsible person at the expense of a non-responsible or a less-responsible person, but that this consideration is not necessarily decisive but rather might be outweighed by another consideration, for example in favor of preventing the more serious harm. I conclude that responsibility for the conditions of justificatory defenses raises a unique question whose proper resolution should be based on the interaction of several general considerations.

Keywords: Responsibility, Justification, Defenses, Lesser Evil, Self-defense

JEL Classification: K00, K14

Suggested Citation

Segev, Re'em, Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses (October 27, 2015). Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 97-110, 2017, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper No. 16-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2680539

Re'em Segev (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, 91905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://en.law.huji.ac.il/people/reem-segev

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
536
Rank
489,057
PlumX Metrics