Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=270833
 
 

References (3)



 


 



Optimal Capital Structure: Problems with the Harvard and Damodaran Approaches


Pablo Fernandez


University of Navarra - IESE Business School

November 23, 2013


Abstract:     
In this paper we will present an analysis of the optimal capital structure using two examples: one proposed by the Harvard Business School and the other proposed by Damodaran.

First, we highlight certain inconsistencies in the debt and equity costs assumed by the Harvard Business School note from a number of viewpoints. We calculate the incremental cost of debt implied in Harvard's note and we find also inconsistencies: surprisingly, the last two debt increments have a cost of 14.75% and 18.5%, while the required return to equity in the unlevered company is 12%. With respect to the cost of debt, the inconsistency is not the cost of debt (the bank can charge whatever interest it likes) but in assuming that the debt's cost is the same as its required return (or that debt's value equals its nominal value). We also calculate the required return to incremental equity cash flow implied in Harvard's note and we find that the required return first falls, then increases, and then falls again. The required incremental return should fall as the leverage decreases. The probability of bankruptcy almost doubles beyond the optimal capital structure. The difference between the required return to equity and the required return to debt decreases for debt levels above the optimal capital structure. It is also shown that assuming no leverage costs there is no optimal structure (the company's value increases with the debt ratio) and the difference between required return to equity and the required return to debt is constant.

Damodaran (1994) offers a similar approach to that of the Harvard Business School note, but applies it to a real company (Boeing in 1990) and assumes a constant cash flow growth. One problem with Damodaran results is that the value of the firm (D E) for debt ratios above 70% is less than the value of debt, which implies a negative value for equity. We calculate the incremental cost of debt implied in Damodaran's example. It can be seen that increasing debt to take the debt ratio from 30% to 40% implies contracting that debt at 21.5%, which is an enormous figure. Stranger still is the finding that the next debt increment (which has a higher risk) is cheaper: it costs 19%. An additional error in Damodaran's calculations is that he calculates the WACC using book values in the weighting, instead of market values.

It is also shown that if it is assumed that the debt's market value is the same as its book value, then the capital structure that minimizes the WACC also maximizes the share price. However, without this assumption, the minimum value of the WACC may not occur at the same point as the maximum share price.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Optimal capital structure, Required return to incremental equity cash flow, Incremental cost of debt, Required return on debt, Required return to equity, Adjusted present value, Return on assets, Return on equity, Weighted average cost of capital, Free cash flow

JEL Classification: G12, G31, M21

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 22, 2001 ; Last revised: November 26, 2013

Suggested Citation

Fernandez, Pablo, Optimal Capital Structure: Problems with the Harvard and Damodaran Approaches (November 23, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=270833 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.270833

Contact Information

Pablo Fernandez (Contact Author)
University of Navarra - IESE Business School ( email )
Camino del Cerro del Aguila 3
28023 Madrid
Spain
+34 91 357 0809 (Phone)
+34 91 357 2913 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://web.iese.edu/PabloFernandez/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 30,922
Downloads: 10,487
Download Rank: 177
References:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds