A New Peonage?: Pay, Work, or Go to Jail in Contemporary Child Support Enforcement and Beyond

30 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2016 Last revised: 30 Jun 2016

See all articles by Noah Zatz

Noah Zatz

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: February 10, 2016

Abstract

Child support enforcement is one of several contemporary contexts in which the state threatens to incarcerate people if they fail to work. This symposium essay explores whether this practice violates the Thirteenth Amendment’s ban on involuntary servitude. At first glance, such threats fall squarely within the ambit of the early 20th century peonage cases. There, the Supreme Court struck down criminal enforcement of legal obligations to work off a debt. Several modern courts have declined to reach a similar conclusion when child support enforcement puts obligors to a choice between paying, working, and going to jail. To do so, these courts have invoked the debtor’s freedom to choose for whom he works, as well as a variety of ad hoc exceptions to the Amendment’s reach. Those rationales are criticized and used to illustrate broader questions in the jurisprudence of free labor.

Keywords: Thirteenth Amendment Sesquicentennial Symposium, child support enforcement, peonage cases, criminal enforment of legal obligations

Suggested Citation

Zatz, Noah, A New Peonage?: Pay, Work, or Go to Jail in Contemporary Child Support Enforcement and Beyond (February 10, 2016). 39 (3) Seattle University Law Review 927 (2016), UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 16-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2730760

Noah Zatz (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
169
Abstract Views
1,067
Rank
321,784
PlumX Metrics