The Harm in Selecting Funds that Have Recently Outperformed
California Institute of Technology
Jason C. Hsu
Rayliant Global Advisors; Research Affiliates, LLC; University of California, Los Angeles - Anderson School of Business
The American College; Pennsylvania State University
February 25, 2016
We empirically investigate the investment results of commonly used fund selection strategies that involve redeploying assets from underperforming to outperforming funds. Based on portfolios constructed using U.S. mutual fund data over typical three-year evaluation periods, we find that investors who chose funds with poor recent performance earned higher excess returns than those who chose funds with superior recent performance. Our findings pose a challenge for asset owners: If past performance is used at all in selecting funds, it is the best-performing funds that should be replaced. Realistically, however, a policy of replacing successful funds with poor performers is unlikely to gain widespread acceptance. Instead, the practical implication of our paper is that asset owners should focus on factors other than past performance. We offer alternate criteria for selecting funds.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: Asset Management, Investment Consultants, Fund Performance, Mutual Fund Selection
JEL Classification: G23, G11
Date posted: February 13, 2016 ; Last revised: February 28, 2016
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds