Intellectual Property Rights versus Competition Law

Kurukshetra Law Journal Vol. I, May 2011, pp. 188-210, ISSN 2231-5519, Deptt. of Law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana-India

21 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2016

See all articles by Naresh Vats

Naresh Vats

National Law University Assam

Date Written: May 2, 2011

Abstract

The first view expresses that there is a tension between competition and intellectual property, arguing that competition law seeks to eliminate monopolies and encourage competition, while IPR laws reward creators and inventors with a limited monopoly. According to the proponents of this view, the main function of IPR laws is to properly assign and defend property rights on assets that have economic value. On the other hand, the main goal of competition law should be to minimize the adverse consequences of monopoly power arising from IPRs.

The second view expresses that competition law continues to be a vital means of ensuring continued innovation and economic growth. The aims and objectives of IPRs and competition laws are complementary, as both aims to encourage innovation, competition and enhance consumer welfare. It is vitally important to preserve competition for innovation because competition ensures the best outcome for consumers.

Keywords: Property, Competition, Rights, Barriers

Suggested Citation

Vats, Naresh, Intellectual Property Rights versus Competition Law (May 2, 2011). Kurukshetra Law Journal Vol. I, May 2011, pp. 188-210, ISSN 2231-5519, Deptt. of Law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana-India, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2735771

Naresh Vats (Contact Author)

National Law University Assam ( email )

NEJOTI Building, B.K. Kakati Road
Bholanath Mandir Path, Ulubari
Guwahati, Assam 781007
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
155
Abstract Views
614
Rank
341,933
PlumX Metrics