Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2746211
 


 



Limitless Worker Surveillance


Ifeoma Ajunwa


University of the District of Columbia - David A. Clarke School of Law

Kate Crawford


Microsoft Research; MIT Center for Civic Media; NYU Information Law Institute

Jason Schultz


New York University School of Law

March 10, 2016

California Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 3, 2017, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
From the Pinkerton private detectives of the 1850s, to the closed-circuit cameras and email monitoring of the 1990s, to contemporary apps that quantify the productivity of workers, American employers have increasingly sought to track the activities of their employees. Along with economic and technological limits, the law has always been presumed as a constraint on these surveillance activities. Recently, technological advancements in several fields – data analytics, communications capture, mobile device design, DNA testing, and biometrics – have dramatically expanded capacities for worker surveillance both on and off the job. At the same time, the cost of many forms of surveillance has dropped significantly, while new technologies make the surveillance of workers even more convenient and accessible. This leaves the law as the last meaningful avenue to delineate boundaries for worker surveillance.

In this Article, we examine the effectiveness of the law as a check on worker surveillance, given recent technological innovations. In particular, we focus on two popular trends in worker tracking – productivity apps and worker wellness programs – to argue that current legal constraints are insufficient and may leave American workers at the mercy of 24/7 employer monitoring. We then propose a new comprehensive framework for worker privacy protections that should withstand current and future trends.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2016 ; Last revised: August 22, 2016

Suggested Citation

Ajunwa, Ifeoma and Crawford, Kate and Schultz, Jason, Limitless Worker Surveillance (March 10, 2016). California Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 3, 2017, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2746211

Contact Information

Ifeoma Ajunwa (Contact Author)
University of the District of Columbia - David A. Clarke School of Law ( email )
4200 Connecticut Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20003
United States
Kate Crawford
Microsoft Research ( email )
641 Avenue of the Americas
641 Avenue of the Americas, level 7
New York, NY NY 10011
United States
MIT Center for Civic Media ( email )
75 Amherst St
Cambridge, MA 02139
United States
NYU Information Law Institute ( email )
Wilf Hall
139 MacDougal Street
New York, NY NY 10012
United States
Jason Schultz
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 21,068
Downloads: 1,770
Download Rank: 6,040

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.328 seconds