Favoritism Under Social Pressure
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business - Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
London School of Economics
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
University of Chicago, GSB Working Paper
This paper provides empirical evidence of favoritism by agents, where that favoritism is generated by social pressure. To do so, we explore the behavior of professional soccer referees. Referees have discretion over the addition of extra time at the end of a soccer game (called injury time), to compensate for lost time due to unusual stoppages. We test for systematic bias shown by Spanish referees in favor of home teams. We show that referees systematically favor home teams by shortening close games where the home team is ahead, and lengthening close games where the home team is behind. They show no such bias for games that are not close. We further show that when the rewards for winning games increase, referees change their bias accordingly. We also identify that the mechanism through which bias operates is the referees' desire to satisfy the crowd, by documenting how the size and composition of the crowd affect referee favoritism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37
Keywords: Incentives, Bias, Tournaments, Social Interactions, Sports
JEL Classification: D8, J4, L2working papers series
Date posted: July 22, 2001
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds