|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper,
please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id588583. ; Size: 208K
|
|
Deficient Statutory Notices and the Burdens of Proof: A Reply to Mr. Newton
Leandra Lederman
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Tax Notes, Vol. 91, No. 16, July 2, 2001
Abstract:
This article replies to an article written by Anthony Newton. (Tax Notes, May 14, 2001, p. 1139.) Mr. Newton argued that Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183 (1999), will help alleviate the burden on taxpayers from uninformative notices of deficiency. This reply contends that although Shea may have reached a correct result in shifting the burden of proof to the IRS, it did so by muddying an important area of the law. In fact, by conflating two procedural rules to reach its decision, the Tax Court may have eliminated the possibility of sanction for some uninformative notices.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: September 10, 2004
Suggested CitationLederman, Leandra, Deficient Statutory Notices and the Burdens of Proof: A Reply to Mr. Newton. Tax Notes, Vol. 91, No. 16, July 2, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=275492
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
