Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=275523
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Contract, Property and the Role of Metaphor in Corporations Law


Thomas Wuil Joo


University of California - Davis Law School

2001

UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 35, February 2002

Abstract:     
Cognitive scientists have described the role of metaphor as the attempt to understand one domain of knowledge (the "target") in terms of another (the "source"). Corporations law scholarship is currently dominated by a metaphor which attempts to explain corporations in terms of contracts. This "contractarian" metaphor derives from the economic model of the "firm" as a set of "contracts." The legal version of the metaphor exhibits confusion about both its target and its source. The economic concept of the "firm" is not equivalent to the legal concept of the "corporation." Nor is the economic "contract," a voluntary reciprocal relationship, equivalent to the legal "contract," a legally enforceable relationship that is partly, but not entirely, based on voluntary consent. Contractarian discourse uses the term "contract" loosely, however, and conflates voluntariness and enforceability.

The contractarian metaphor helps show that the firm is not a black box whose characteristics are immune from market forces. But it wrongly suggests that individual choice is the basis for the legitimacy of all legally enforceable corporate relationships. The metaphor masks the fact that the rules of corporate law are often based on social welfare judgments of judges, lawmakers and regulators rather than on parties' bargains in the marketplace. It misleadingly suggests that the law imposes no value judgments but merely rubber-stamps freely made individual decisions. Thus the model lulls us into thinking we can avoid the hard questions of how the law makes its value judgments. Because the concept of "property" includes rights and duties not based on assent, a property-based metaphor for corporations can help put the "law" back into this branch of "private law."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 29, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Joo, Thomas Wuil, Contract, Property and the Role of Metaphor in Corporations Law (2001). UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 35, February 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=275523 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.275523

Contact Information

Thomas Wuil Joo (Contact Author)
University of California - Davis Law School ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
400 Mrak Hall Dr.
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
(530) 754-6089 (Phone)
(530) 752-4704 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,443
Downloads: 370
Download Rank: 44,264
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds