|
||||
|
||||
Takeovers, Freezeouts, and Risk Arbitrage
Armando R. Gomes Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business March 2001 PIER Working Paper No. 01-027; U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 01-10 Abstract: This paper develops a dynamic model of tender offers in which there is trading on the target's shares during the takeover, and bidders can freeze out target shareholders (compulsorily acquire remaining shares not tendered at the bid price), features that prevail on almost all takeovers. We show that trading allows for the entry of arbitrageurs with large blocks of shares who can hold out a freezeout - a threat that forces the bidder to offer a high preemptive bid. There is also a positive relationship between the takeover premium and arbitrageurs' accumulation of shares before the takeover announcement, and the less liquid the target stock, the strong this relationship is. Moreover, freezeouts eliminate the free-rider problem, but front-end loaded bids, such as two-tiered and partial offers, do not benefit bidders because arbitrageurs can undo any potential benefit and eliminate the coerciveness of these offers. Similarly, the takeover premium is also largely unrelated to the bidder's ability to dilute the target's shareholders after the acquisition, also due to potential arbitrage activity.
Keywords: Takeovers, freezeouts, arbitrage, hold-out power JEL Classifications: C78, D82, G43 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 18, 2001 ; Last revised: August 17, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.140 seconds.