Productivity Growth in the 1990s: Technology, Utilization, or Adjustment?
John G. Fernald
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Boston College, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Matthew D. Shapiro
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
June 9, 2001
FRB of Chicago Working Paper No. 2001-04
Measured productivity growth increased substantially during the second half of the 1990s. This paper examines whether this increase owes to an increase in the rate of technological change or whether it can be explained by non-technological factors relating to factor utilization, factor accumulation, or returns to scale. It finds that the recent increase in productivity growth does appear to arise from an increase in technological change. Cyclical utilization raised measured productivity growth relative to technology growth in the first part of the expansion, but lowered it subsequently. Factor adjustment leads to a steady-state understatement of technology growth by measured productivity growth. The understatement was greater in the second half of the expansion than the first. Changes in the distribution of inputs across industries with different returns to scale lead to a modest understatement in the growth in technology. Although the increase technological change is most pronounced in durable manufacturing, technological change also increased outside of manufacturing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
JEL Classification: E22, O30, O47
Date posted: July 21, 2001
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds