|
||||
|
||||
Institutions and Structural Unemployment: Do Capital-Market Imperfections Matter?
Ansgar Hubertus Belke University of Duisburg-Essen - Department of Economics; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Rainer Fehn CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) June 2001 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 504 Abstract: This paper analyzes whether differences in institutional structures on capital markets contribute to explaining why some OECD-countries, in particular the Anglo-Saxon countries, have been much more successful over the last two decades in producing employment growth and in reducing unemployment than most continental-European OECD-countries. It is argued that the often-blamed labor market rigidities alone, while important, do not provide a satisfactory explanation for these differences across countries and over time. Financial constraints are potentially important obstacles against creating new firms and jobs and thus against coping well with structural change and against moving successfully toward the "new economy". Highly developed venture capital markets should help to alleviate such financial constraints. This view that labor-market institutions should be supplemented by capital market imperfections for explaining differences in employment performances is supported by our panel data analysis, in which venture capital turns out to be a significant institutional variable.
Keywords: Labor Markets, Unemployment, New Economy, Panel Analysis, Venture Capital JEL Classifications: E22, E24, E44, G24, G32 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: August 01, 2001 ; Last revised: September 01, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.