Brown V. Board of Education Fifty Years Later: What Makes for Greatness in a Legal Opinion?

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 36, 2004

Posted: 12 May 2016

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

The article focuses on some of the purported shortcomings of Brown v. Board of Education. The article establishes a framework for discussing criticisms of this landmark case by means of a brief overview of the Court's reasoning in Brown. After addressing the criticisms, and following a personal reflection on the author's experiences growing up in the Jim Crow South, the article concludes that Brown v. Board of Education was rightly decided for the right reasons. Together with the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution itself, Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech, the Brown decision deserves its revered standing among the pantheon of essential writings that are fairly to be regarded as defining the essence of the American spirit.

Keywords: Brown v. Board of Education, Equal Protection, Education, Integration, Segreagation, Discrimination

Suggested Citation

Williams, Neil Gregory, Brown V. Board of Education Fifty Years Later: What Makes for Greatness in a Legal Opinion? (2005). Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 36, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2778300

Neil Gregory Williams (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
232
PlumX Metrics