|
||||
|
||||
Influencing Profits: The Differential Impact of Lobbying on Corporate Stock ReturnsMichelle HutchensIndiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Accounting Sonja O. RegoIndiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Accounting Amy Genson ShenemanIndiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Accounting April 29, 2016 Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 16-41 Abstract: Prior research provides mixed evidence on whether corporate lobbying activities increase or decrease shareholder value. In this study we use detailed data on corporate lobbying expenditures to investigate which factors influence the returns to corporate lobbying activities. Specifically, we examine whether the returns vary by lobbying issue (e.g., tax-, defense-, or healthcare-related), by the severity of agency problems, by the lobbying approach employed, and by the potential benefits to be gained lobbying. Our results suggest that although the association between abnormal stock returns and total lobbying expenditures is generally positive and significant, the returns to lobbying vary substantially depending on the issue being lobbied. While investors expect lobbying on tax-, defense-, trade-, and federal budget-related issues to generate significant economic benefits for firms, they expect the returns to environment-related lobbying to actually decrease shareholder value. We also provide evidence that the returns to lobbying are more positive for firms with low free cash flows, for firms that adopt a relational approach to lobbying, and for firms with the largest potential benefits to be gained from lobbying. Overall, our research suggests that corporate lobbying activities represent strategic political investments that generate future economic benefits, not agency problems as asserted by some prior studies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43 Keywords: Corporate Lobbying, Shareholder Value, Stock Returns, Relational Approach, Tax JEL Classification: D21, G14, G39, H25, H32, K20, M21, M49 Date posted: May 14, 2016 ; Last revised: June 26, 2016Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.188 seconds