SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (39)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Protecting Natural Capital through Ecosystem Service Districts

Geoffrey M. Heal
Columbia Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Gretchen Daily
Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences

Paul Ehrlich
Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences

James Salzman
Duke University - School of Law

Carol Boggs
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology

Jessica Hellman
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology

Jennifer Hughes
Brown University

Claire Kremen
Princeton University - Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Taylor Ricketts
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology




Abstract:     
In this article, we focus on the potential of governmental authorities dedicated to management of ecosystem services. We argue that the creation of such Ecosystem Service Districts (ESDs) will improve the efficient provision of services necessary for human welfare. At the moment, when agencies manage for natural resources, they typically do so in a defined geographical area or district. Given the prevalence and importance of districts for soil conservation, resource conservation, flood control, and other local services, we explain how ESDs could provide a coherent and efficient governmental institution for monitoring and investing in natural capital. A focus on ESDs would create a mechanism to help ensure that natural capital is protected and maintained with the same care and concern as that given to built and human capital.

Establishing and managing ESDs will involve an exploration of the underlying ecological processes that provide the services, of the economic significance of the services, and of the legal issues involved in managing natural ecosystems for the good of a local or regional community. Central in all these analyses will be land use decisions. Land use determines which of the initial ecosystems and services are maintained intact. In addition, many of the key trade-offs between the continued functioning of natural ecosystems and the extension of economic activities arise naturally in the context of land-use choices, such as farming versus forestation, development versus conservation, etc.

In examining the geographical, economic, and legal obstacles in designing ESDs, we suggest an integrative framework for managing the patterns of land use in a district that can provide several different ecosystem services, and that also has the potential to support many different types of economic activity, some of which can conflict with the continued integrity of the natural ecosystems. Part I of the article explains the why ecosystem services are under threat and the potential benefits of managing their conservation through ESDs. Part II lays out the basic ecological-economic framework and principles for district design. Part III sets out the key legal issues and Part IV presents a tentative roadmap of how to put theory into practice. The importance of ecosystem services is no longer disputed. How to realize more fully their value, and hence their conservation, however, remains an active research area. ESDs, though fraught with challenges, provide a potentially powerful institutional mechanism to address the relative neglect of ecosystem services in public policy by bringing their crucial importance into focus and aiding in their preservation.

Keywords: Ecosystem services, public goods, natural capital, environment, legal framework, environmental law

JEL Classifications: H50, Q01, Q20, R00

Working Paper Series

Date posted: September 24, 2001 ; Last revised: September 27, 2001

Suggested Citation

Heal, Geoffrey M., Daily, Gretchen, Ehrlich, Paul, Salzman, James E., Boggs, Carol, Hellman, Jessica, Hughes, Jennifer, Kremen, Claire and Ricketts, Taylor, Protecting Natural Capital through Ecosystem Service Districts. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=279114 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.279114


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Geoffrey M. Heal (Contact Author)
Columbia Business School ( email )
3022 Broadway
616 Uris
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-6459 (Phone)
212-316-9219 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/gheal/
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Carol Boggs
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Gretchen Daily
Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences ( email )
Stanford, CA United States
Paul Ehrlich
Stanford University - Department of Biological Sciences ( email )
Stanford, CA United States
Not Available (Phone)
Not Available (Fax)
Jessica Hellman
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Jennifer Hughes
Brown University
Department of Biology
Providence, RI 02912
United States
Claire Kremen
Princeton University - Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology ( email )
M31 Guyot Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
609-258-7313 (Phone)
Taylor Ricketts
Stanford University - Center for Conservation Biology
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
James E. Salzman
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 90360
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,030
Downloads: 314
Download Rank: 25,894
Citations: 1
Footnotes: 39

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 16.205 seconds.