Tax Competition and Fiscal Equalization Under Corporate Income Taxation

22 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2016

See all articles by Caterina Liesegang

Caterina Liesegang

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

Marco Runkel

University of Munich - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Date Written: July 27, 2016

Abstract

This paper challenges the view that tax base equalization by the so-called Representative Tax System (RTS) removes inefficient undertaxation in corporate tax competition. The innovation of the paper is that it focuses on a tax on corporate income, instead of the unit tax on capital considered in previous studies. We employ a tax competition model with fiscal equalization and show that the RTS fails to fully internalize pecuniary and fiscal externalities. As consequence, the RTS yields inefficiently low tax rates in the Nash equilibrium of the tax competition game between governments. Tax revenue equalization performs even worse, but combined with equalization of private income it implements the efficient tax rates on corporate income.

Keywords: corporate income taxation, tax competition, fiscal equalization

JEL Classification: H250, H710, H770

Suggested Citation

Liesegang, Caterina and Runkel, Marco, Tax Competition and Fiscal Equalization Under Corporate Income Taxation (July 27, 2016). CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2828604 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2828604

Caterina Liesegang

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg ( email )

Faculty of Economics and Management
PSF 4120
Magdeburg, 39016
Germany
+493916718736 (Phone)
+493916711218 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.vwl1.ovgu.de

Marco Runkel (Contact Author)

University of Munich - Department of Economics ( email )

Schackstr. 4
Munich, 80539
Germany
++49 (0) 89 2180 6339 (Phone)
++49 (0) 89 2180 3128 (Fax)

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
430
Rank
567,883
PlumX Metrics