|
||||
|
||||
Recurrent Trade Agreements and the Value of External Enforcement
Mikhail M. Klimenko Georgia Institute of Technology - School of Economics Joel C. Watson University of California, San Diego - Department of Economics Garey Ramey University of California, San Diego - Department of Economics June 2001 UCSD Economics Discussion Paper 2001-01 Abstract: This paper presents a theory of dynamic trade agreements in which external institutions, such as the WTO, play a central role in supporting credible enforcement. In our model, countries engage in ongoing negotiations, and as a consequence cooperative agreements become unsustainable in the absence of external enforcement institutions. By using mechanisms such as delays in dispute resolution and direct penalties, enforcement institutions can restore incentives for cooperation, despite the lack of any coercive power. The occurrence of costly trade disputes, and the feasibility of mechanisms such as escape clauses, depend on the adaptability of enforcement institutions in their use of information.
Keywords: Institutions, Recurrent Negotiation, Dispute Resolution, Cooperation, WTO JEL Classifications: F13, K33, C72 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 14, 2001 ; Last revised: October 09, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.328 seconds.