Citations (4)


Footnotes (142)



Legislating Apology: The Pros and Cons

Jonathan R. Cohen

University of Florida Levin College of Law

August 2001

Should apologies be admissible into evidence as proof of fault in civil cases? The past year has seen a tremendous rise in "apology legislation" designed to exclude apologies from admissibility into evidence. For example, California passed a law in 2000 barring apologetic expressions of sympathy ("I'm sorry that you are hurt") but not fault-admitting apologies ("I'm sorry that I injured you") after accidents from introduction into evidence as proof of fault. Other states are now debating proposed apology legislation, including bills that would exclude fault-admitting apologies from evidence. As apologies can be central elements in preventing and settling lawsuits, such legislation has the potential to dramatically affect dispute resolution and legal practice. This Article examines policy arguments that can be made supporting and opposing such legislation and offers remaining questions for future research.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 76

Keywords: Apology, dispute resolution, conflict resolution, negotiation, evidence, forgiveness

JEL Classification: K40, K41, D74

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Cohen, Jonathan R., Legislating Apology: The Pros and Cons (August 2001). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=283213 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.283213

Contact Information

Jonathan R. Cohen (Contact Author)
University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
(352) 273-0919 (Phone)
(352) 392-3005 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,576
Downloads: 347
Download Rank: 47,757
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  142

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.250 seconds