Fairness, Escalation, Deference, and Spite: Strategies Used in Labor-Management Bargaining Experiments with Outside Options
Middlebury College - Department of Economics
Jeffrey P. Carpenter
Middlebury College - Department of Economics; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
May 6, 2001
Labor-management negotiations are an example of a situation in which outside options may play an important role in determining outcomes. In particular, firms may attempt to use outside options to extract concessions from unions. In reviewing two recent cases of bargaining between management and a union, we notice that although the situations appear similar, the negotiated outcomes are dramatically different. We hypothesize that behavioral factors may play a role. To test this conjecture, we construct a bargaining experiment. Our results suggest that outside options do affect bargaining behavior. First, we find that many "fair" offers are rejected and, in general, the rate of conflict is high. Second, firms who search for outside options, but do not take them, return to bargaining and make higher offers than if they had not searched. Third, overall the act of searching by firms tends to trigger concessions from unions except when the union has previously been "hung out to dry" by a firm accepting an outside option. In this case unions react spitefully.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: experiment, bargaining, outside option, deference, spite
JEL Classification: C72, C91, J52working papers series
Date posted: September 28, 2001
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds