Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=286455
 
 

Footnotes (35)



 


 



Improving the Qualifications of Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases


David Bernstein


George Mason University School of Law

2001

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-24

Abstract:     
For decades, legal scholars have recognized the problem of physicians testifying beyond their expertise in medical malpractice cases. This article explains why courts have historically been liberal about admitting testimony by unqualified or marginally-qualified experts in malpractice cases, discusses recent legislative and judicial innovations that have tightened the standards for admitting medical experts, and proposes a new "reasonable patient" rule that balances the need to ensure that plaintiffs with worthy claims are able to procure expert testimony with methods of assuring that only competent experts will testify.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 8, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, David, Improving the Qualifications of Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases (2001). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=286455 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.286455

Contact Information

David Eliot Bernstein (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8089 (Phone)
703-993-8202 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dbernste
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,626
Downloads: 279
Download Rank: 62,941
Footnotes:  35

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds