SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 



Tort Law and Criminal Behavior (Guns)

Mark Geistfeld
New York University - School of Law



Arizona Law Review, Vol. 43, Pp. 311-337

Abstract:     
This article, written for the symposium on Guns, Crime and Punishment in America, analyzes the relation between tort law and criminal behavior. The analysis reveals an inconsistency that requires redress. In applying negligence doctrine, courts have expressly recognized that the threat of criminal and tort liability does not induce perfect compliance with the law. By contrast, in applying the rule of strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities, courts assume everyone acts lawfully. For reasons illustrated by the tort cases involving the manufacture and distribution of handguns, courts should eliminate the inconsistency by applying the rule of strict liability in a manner that accounts for unlawful behavior. The use of strict liability to enforce the duty of care, which is expressly rejected by the proposed Restatement Third of Torts: General Principles, is faithful to the rule of strict liability in the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Moreover, the enforcement rationale for strict liability is consistent with other rationales for strict liability, including the reciprocity rationale. The value of the enforcement rationale for strict liability is illustrated by the tort cases involving handgun manufacturers. The enforcement rationale reveals that the appropriateness of strict liability depends on how the self-defense interests of non-criminal gun owners should be weighed against the competing security interests of individuals who do not own guns and are exposed to the risk of being injured by gun-toting criminals. In an analogous context, tort law has decided in favor of self-defense. The implications of this well-established tort principle provide a persuasive rationale for not applying strict liability to the manufacture and distribution of handguns, a rationale far superior to the existing rationale that dismisses the strict liability claim on the ground that the threat of negligence liability induces all gun-toting criminals to exercise reasonable care.

JEL Classifications: K13, K42

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: October 20, 2001 ; Last revised: November 29, 2001

Suggested Citation

Geistfeld, Mark, Tort Law and Criminal Behavior (Guns). Arizona Law Review, Vol. 43, Pp. 311-337. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=286874


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Mark Geistfeld (Contact Author)
New York University - School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
Room 411A
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6683 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 802
Downloads: 0

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apolloc 6 in 0.266 seconds.