|
||||
|
||||
Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms
Laura Casares Field Pennsylvania State University - Mary Jean and Frank P. Smeal College of Business Administration Jonathan M. Karpoff University of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, No. 5, October 2002 Abstract: Many firms deploy takeover defenses when they go public. We find that IPO managers are more likely to deploy defenses when their compensation is high, shareholdings are small, and oversight from non-managerial shareholders is weak. The presence of a takeover defense at the time of the IPO is negatively related to subsequent acquisition likelihood, yet has no impact on takeover premiums for firms that are acquired. These results do not support arguments that takeover defenses facilitate the eventual sale of the IPO firm at high takeover premiums. Rather, they suggest that managers shift the cost of takeover protection onto non-managerial shareholders. Thus, agency problems are important even for firms at the IPO stage.
Keywords: Initial Public Offerings, Takeover Defenses, Acquisitions JEL Classifications: G30, G32, G34, G24 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 08, 2002 ; Last revised: August 29, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.110 seconds.