Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=288391
 
 

Footnotes (22)



 


 



The Impact of Quantitative Argumentation in Legal Discourse


Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos


Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law

November 16, 2001


Abstract:     
Mathematical models and law & economics have proliferated in the legal academy. This article studies the impact of legal articles that use an economic methodology. Courts are not averse to citing quantitative articles. The narrowly argued structure of economic argumentation of refereed journals, however, prevents those articles from being cited extensively because courts prefer to cite articles with broad, encyclopedic argumentation. The insistence of faculty-refereed journals on narrowly argued, high-level-of-proof argumentation undermines the impact of economic analysis of law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: publication, referee, refereeing, citation analysis

JEL Classification: K00, K49

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2001  

Suggested Citation

Georgakopoulos, Nicholas L., The Impact of Quantitative Argumentation in Legal Discourse (November 16, 2001). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=288391 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.288391

Contact Information

Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos (Contact Author)
Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
317-274-1825 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nicholasgeorgakopoulos.org

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,579
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 107,500
Footnotes:  22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds